Sathfilms


Perhaps “progressive” is too loaded?
May 5, 2007, 9:45 am
Filed under: Morality,Religion,Spirituality,TS,meaning...

Progressive Christians « St.Mary’s-by-the-Woods

Perhaps progressive is not the best word to use since its become so loaded. Interesting what issues open-mindedness can create in terms of views that are incorrect.

For example, and for arguments sake, instead of calling ourselves Australians, Americans, Indians, etc or Hindus, Christians, Muslims, etc, let’s call ourselves a community of humans that are all racing towards the same goal which is available to everyone. So it seems that the linked blog post is saying: what then, of certain people who could possibly do things that seem morally wrong (in my opinion for this example) in their journey towards God, or whatever their aim in life might be. As said in the linked blog post, perhaps someone somewhere believes that disrimination towards a particular community would bring them closer to God (or that they believe that they must act in such a way to go to Heaven) and that it’s the right thing to do - what happens then? Is that accepted? Surely not. I can understand that’s its difficult to say what is right and what is wrong and at the same time accept all views, but surely in accepting other views (referring to the blog post on Progressive Christians) there must be an assumption of a necessary equality and indiscriminatory values – otherwise how can people accept, let alone respect, other people’s views? So, perhaps the Progressive Christian Newsletter needs to explicitly state what they accept? Perhaps they do accept everything without any sort of conditions?

I think if you say you’re “progressive,” it’s probably best to explain exactly how – that’s only if you care about what others think.


5 Comments so far
Leave a comment

http://pressposts.com/Religion/Perhaps-progressive-is-too-loaded/

Submited post on PressPosts.com – “Perhaps ?progressive? is too loaded?”

Trackback by PressPosts / User / Stileta / Submitted

I think terming one’s religion ‘progressive’ is more an act of seeking acceptance than anything else. Today’s society loves anything that is ‘progressive’ or ‘open minded’…but what about when these values dilute the truth because it is just easier to handle it that way?

This seems to tie in with an idea raised in another post of yours – loving God. “Fundamentalist’s Christians” have an idea of what is pleasing to God, and as an act of love, they want to fulfill that. They don’t think that they are earning God’s love, but are just showing him their returning love. It seems like that idea is wrong and close minded, but isn’t this just a reflection of the way love is played out in the physical world?

Comment by James

I think ‘progressive’ in the religious context is when for example a new way of thought is introduced which is looked upon with extreme prejudice and persecution but is then accepted by followers within that religion..and hence the religion changes along with societal changes while the traditionalists merely see the progressives as sinners.

Comment by Shannon

Yeah – but these changes reflect societies changes….but do they reflect the desires of God?

Comment by James

[...] Are progressive religions seeking acceptance? Perhaps “progressive” is too loaded? « Sathfilms [...]

Pingback by Are progressive religions seeking acceptance? « Sathfilms




Leave a comment
Line and paragraph breaks automatic, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <pre> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>